| 张煜.论八纲与两纲六要[J].南京中医药大学学报(社会科学版),2013,29(3):201-204. |
| 论八纲与两纲六要 |
| On Eight Principles and Two Principles-Six Essentials |
| 投稿时间：2012-12-09 修订日期：2013-03-01 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 八纲 两纲六要 辨证 源流 |
| 英文关键词: Eight Principles Two Principles-Six Essentials syndrome differentiation origin |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1153 |
| 全文下载次数: 1033 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在阐述八纲起源、繁衍、发展、成熟之源流的基础上，指出阴、阳、表、里、虚、实、寒、热“八纲”的平列，易导致学生对“阴阳辨证”概念产生混淆，对其辨证内涵亦迷惑不解。认为应加强阴阳在“八纲”中的总纲和法纪作用，分述“两纲六要”，即在教材中仍然沿用“八纲辨证”章节之名，但在其下须分述“两纲”和“六要”。这样既可以保证“八纲”的完整性，又能突出阴阳的纲纪作用，充分体现“两纲”与“六要”的层次性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the detailed description of the origin， development and maturity of "Eight Principles"， this paper pointed that ignoring the logic defects on equally treating the importance of "Eight Principles" yin， yang， exterior， interior， cold， heat， deficiency and excess syndromes would lead to students' confused understanding of the concept of "yin and yang syndrome differentiation" as well as its connotation. It is suggested that the recapitulative and governing status of yin and yang should be emphasized. That is to say， "Two Principles" and "Six Essentials" should be discussed respectively under the chapter named "Eight Principles Syndrome Differentiation" so as to ensure the completeness of "Eight Principles"， stress the recapitulative and governing status of yin and yang， and fully reflect the hierarchy of "Two Principles" and "Six Essentials". |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
